Tuesday 8 July 2008

My Blueberry Nights (2007)


As our avid readers will know, I've been gagging for this for ages. Wong Kar Wai is probably my favorite living director, with the possible exception of Terrence Malick, and, despite certain major reservations (Jude Law; Rachel Weisz, see below), I was fascinated by how this, his first American film, would turn out.

Wong's American odyssey tells the story of broken-hearted Elisabeth (Norah Jones) who, after the failure of her relationship with the love of her life, strikes up a relationship with a sweet and charming cafe owner Jeremy (Law) before taking off on a road trip across America and meeting an assembly of motley characters along the way without ever quite leaving Jeremy behind in New York.

I can't help but feel that this could have been so much better than it is. Pretty much everything falls below, if often only just below, those impeccably high standards Wong has set for himself following his spectacular resume. Wong is without oft used cinematographer, the one and only Christopher Doyle, and it shows. The cinematography - particularly the beautiful and exotic contrasts between the sensuous blues and reds that linger like homeless raindrops in the delicate New York night - is good, but it's not great. The acting is good, but it's not great. The dialogue is good, but it's not great. The story and the narrative drive are good but neither are great. The... well, you get the idea. Take the acting - I just can't, in all honestly, swap Tony Leung, the greatest living actor, for Jude Law without accepting that something has been lost. I also cannot believe Wong cast Rachel Weisz in this and my opinion of him has gone down as a result. Weisz is a terrible actress, although she's not as bad here as she often is and I was genuinely shocked to hear she had been cast in this.

Whilst Law is categorically not Leung, he deserves credit here. He gives a subtle and measured performance as Jeremy and must take great credit for the chemistry between his character and Elisabeth which, at times, lights up the film and provides - by far - its best moments. He is, however, eclipsed by debutant Jones. Jones, who has achieved previous fame as a (forgive me Norah) MOR musician, lights up this film. She is as sweet and sensuous throughout - particularly in the excellent scenes with Law - as the bubbling and foaming blueberry pie that interposes itself occasionally on the action. She is the best thing in it and her performance is some achievement for a debut. Wong clearly has an ability to draw great performances out of non-professional actors and actresses. He does here with Jones what he did, in Chungking Express, with a fresh faced and extraordinarily charismatic Faye Wong, though the characters are as different as cheese and blueberry pie.

For me, this is a film of might have beens. The whole thing could have been great but it ends up being merely good. More should have been made of the scenes between Beth and Jeremy and a potentially interesting sideline, involving the always excellent and underrated David Strathairn, is not developed enough. The storyline involving the poker-playing, deceptive, Leslie (Natalie Portman) is unsatisfactory and very unfulfilling, especially in the film's overall context.

This is, by quite some distance, Wong's 'worst' film I've seen and the only one that doesn't earn a recommendation quality grade. That doesn't make it bad but it does, regrettably, make it a disappointment.

B

3 comments:

Adam said...

Scored a pathetic 45% on rottentomatoes, critics saying it was too thin. That's 10% more than Hancock though, which I just recommended! Liked the review, can't really get myself up for seeing this though.

Stunning photo choice by the way. Can we have a similar standard of photo selection in future?! ;o)

Can't understand the problem with Rachel Weisz. I agree she isn't amazing but I liked her in The Constant Gardner and The Fountain.

And does Jude Law not even deserve a tag?!

Lots of stuff to ask you re: the site. Might give you a quick ring tomorrow if that is okay.

see? i told you... said...

I wondered what would they say if this film wasn't by Wong Kar Wai?

If compare this to his earlier films, plot is not great as I expected it should be. Elizabeth's character, who is main character, was quite flat and Jerame doesn't have the kind of complexity like (my) Tony Leung. Also the ending with the possibility of love which seems to be the first time of Wong’s films. These were the different from Wong's previous works.

Although it doesn't convey as strong as his previous works, it has lots of romantic moments which pleased me. Like what I said, if you are looking for strong plot, it’s not in this film. Instead, the film could give you a feeling of aching yearning and show how a character’s obsession can be played out (especially in Jerame’s dialogues).

Yes, it's not up there with Wong Kar Wai's best film but personally, I enjoyed it.


* not about this topic: saw Rinko Kikuchi on a boat trip yesterday, in BKK (thought she had a day off from 'Shanghai') , hope I will have a chance to meet Gong Li one day.

Matt said...

I agree. It's quite a dramatic shift of focus considering the loss of love anguish that so strongly defined Happy Together, In The Mood, 2046, Chungking Express (or is this the other exception??? Interesting question) and Days of Being Wild.

And you're right, if this wasn't Wong it probably would have been rated a bit more highly, but it just cannot be compared to that immaculate and brilliant list of films I've just mentioned.

I know she was quite badly criticised, but I really liked Norah Jones in this. Think she has a career in film.

See?, if you ever see Rinko again (or indeed Gong Li) could you tell them about our site please : )